How you can be more prescient than Barack Obama
Andrew Sullivan at TheAtlantic.com — along with Obama’s zombie army on Digg.com — is giving Mr. Obama credit for having the “prescient judgment” to predict the housing crisis … in 2007. For perspective, economists at HSBC saw a problem in December 2004. Anyone with more than two neurons between their ears saw that not everybody is going to get to buy more house than they can afford and get away with it.
To be fair, Sullivan is only crediting Barack with being smarter than Hillary Clinton and John McCain, which should be an insulting comparison for normal people, but since this is a politician we’re talking about, maybe he does deserve credit for noticing the obvious. What’s most interesting to me is that Sullivan did not mention the fourth candidate still in the race when lauding Barack’s prescience: Ron Paul. He either omitted the Texas Congressman because he knows Paul was even more “prescient,” or the good doctor is not even on the blogger’s radar. Either way, it takes some willful ignorance to praise Obama when Ron Paul and people like him, beat the Illinois Senator’s analysis by 2 or more years.
The wealth of articles you can find by Googling “housing bubble” with “2004″ or “2005″ makes citing particular ones redundant. Anyone who was paying attention knew trouble was brewing. Nobody was right about what exactly would happen or when, but the fundamentals were obvious to those with even a rudimentary understanding of economics. The axiom held true that markets always do what they’re supposed to do, just not when you expect it.
What we should really be noting about all this was that back in 2004-5, you had to go to the Internet to get anything more than a whisper that something might be wrong. Mainstream TV, radio and newsprint media apparently had little concern over the growing malinvestment in the housing market. The Fed was telling us in October 2005 that everything would be fine. The only ones pointing out any stormclouds this far back were people like gloomy old Ron Paul. Since the housing bubble couldn’t have been easier to spot if it ran up and slapped you, the very compelling question is: Why did the Fed lie to us? If your answer is that this is part of the Fed’s job, in order to help “control” the market, you’d be right. And it’s exactly as fishy as it sounds.
Back then, when all the pundits with the biggest megaphones were telling you everything was just great, the “doomsayers” who saw this coming were dismissed as being out of touch and unfairly down on the economy. Well, they turned out to be right.
What would you rather be? “In touch” and “optimistic”, or correct? The kind of economic prescience that saw the housing bubble a mile away is not difficult to apprehend. In fact, you can get a college-grade education in economics just by reading the recommendations at Mises.org. The Austrian school of economics makes the “dismal science” surprisingly simple and exciting, in part because it makes rational sense; it is rooted in pure logic.
So would you like to be able to beat Saint Obama’s next great economic prediction? Study the Austrian school. I recommend starting with Economics in One Lesson.